Services / Construction Dispute
Construction disputes are among the most complex in litigation practice. They involve technical evidence, multiple parties, long chains of contractual obligation, and significant sums. They also have their own statutory adjudication regime, CIPAA, designed to resolve payment disputes faster than full litigation.
Rabinder Budiman & Associates acts in construction disputes at all levels: CIPAA adjudication, High Court proceedings, and the Court of Appeal. Dato’ Rabinder Singh and the firm’s associates have handled construction matters for contractors, developers, employers, and sub-contractors.

Construction disputes arise at every stage of a project, during design, procurement, construction, completion, and long after practical completion when defects emerge or delay costs are finally counted. They can be between an employer and a main contractor, between a main contractor and a sub-contractor, between a developer and a homebuyer, or between any combination of parties whose contractual obligations have not been met.
What makes construction disputes distinctive is the volume and complexity of the documentation: building contracts running to hundreds of pages, programme schedules, variation orders, site instructions, inspection records, payment certificates, and years of project correspondence. The legal arguments are built on those documents. A construction dispute is won or lost on the quality of the factual and documentary preparation before the adjudicator or court hears a single word.
The Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 gives contractors, sub-contractors, and suppliers the right to refer payment disputes to adjudication, a faster, more cost-efficient process than full High Court litigation. An adjudication decision can be obtained in weeks rather than years. It is binding and immediately enforceable, though it can be reviewed in court proceedings.
CIPAA adjudication is available for any construction contract in writing, including sub-contracts and supply agreements, for work carried out in Malaysia. It does not apply to construction contracts for a dwelling house where one of the parties is a natural person.
We act for both claimants and respondents in CIPAA proceedings. We prepare adjudication claims and responses, instruct adjudicators, and if necessary, enforce or set aside adjudication decisions in the High Court.
Not all construction disputes involve industry participants. Homebuyers and property purchasers have specific rights under the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 and their Sale and Purchase Agreements. Where a developer delivers vacant possession late, delivers a property with defects, or fails to complete the development, you have legal remedies, including claims for liquidated ascertained damages, defect rectification, and in some cases, rescission.
Dato’ Rabinder Singh has direct experience on both sides of this equation. As Chairman of the Management Corporation of Q Sentral, he successfully negotiated a RM2.2 million settlement from the Q Sentral developer for non-compliance with the Sale and Purchase Agreement. He understands how developers respond to these claims and how to push them toward resolution.
Construction matters succeed or fail on the documents: the contract, the correspondence, the site records, the valuations, the programme. We work with the documents from the outset, understanding the contractual framework, identifying the strongest legal arguments, and building the evidential picture that the adjudicator or court will need.
Where expert evidence is needed, on defects, on delay analysis, on quantum, we coordinate with the right experts and ensure their evidence is presented in a form that holds up under cross-examination.


CIPAA stands for the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012. It gives parties to a construction contract in Malaysia the right to refer payment disputes to adjudication, a private, expedited process where an independent adjudicator decides the dispute, typically within 45 working days of the response being filed. The decision is binding and can be enforced as a court judgment. It is faster and less expensive than High Court litigation, specifically designed to address the cash flow problems that unpaid contractors and sub-contractors face.
CIPAA does not apply to construction contracts made by a natural person for a dwelling house for their own occupation. Homebuyers disputing with developers typically rely instead on the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966, the Sale and Purchase Agreement, and if necessary, the Tribunal for Homebuyer Claims or the courts. We advise homebuyers on the most appropriate and cost-effective route for their specific dispute.
Under standard Sale and Purchase Agreement terms regulated by the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966, a developer who delivers vacant possession late is liable to pay liquidated ascertained damages (LAD) at a specified rate per day of delay. You are entitled to claim this without having to prove your actual loss. The developer cannot exclude or limit this obligation by contract. If the developer disputes the delay or refuses to pay, we can pursue the claim on your behalf.
Abandonment is a repudiatory breach of contract, it entitles you to treat the contract as terminated and to claim damages for the cost of completing the work by another contractor, any delay losses, and any additional costs caused by the abandonment. The key steps: do not make further payments, document the state of the works thoroughly, get quotations for completion, and take legal advice before appointing a replacement contractor. We advise on the full range of remedies and help you recover what you are owed.
A performance bond is a financial guarantee issued by a bank or insurer in favour of the employer, securing the contractor’s performance under the contract. If the contractor fails to perform, including by abandonment or material breach, the employer can call on the bond and receive the guaranteed sum. The right to call depends on the bond’s terms: some bonds are on-demand (payable without proof of breach) while others are conditional (requiring proof of default). Malaysian courts have addressed both types. We advise employers and contractors on their rights and obligations in bond calls.
The standard limitation period for contract claims under the Limitation Act 1953 is six years from the date of breach. For defects claims, time typically runs from the date of completion or the date the defect was or should have been discovered. Some construction contracts include shorter contractual time bars, particularly for extension of time claims, which may require notices to be served within specified periods, failing which the right to claim is lost. Taking advice early is essential in construction matters.
Whether you are a contractor pursuing a payment claim, a developer defending a dispute, or a homebuyer whose rights under your Sale and Purchase Agreement have not been respected, get in touch before the deadlines close.
Tell us what is happening. We will tell you honestly whether we can help and what the next step looks like.